The FAA fined the guy who crashed a drone at the White House, people who flew over sporting events, and two pilots who crashed their drones into the ocean in Puerto Rico.
Lots of people have been fined for flying drones when they pose a threat to those on the ground or aircraft in the sky. However, the punishments levied by the US government against people who fly drones appear to be mostly arbitrary: They range between $400 and $5,500 (with one outlier at $1.9 million), the cases are almost entirely concentrated on the East Coast, and the specific wording and regulations the Federal Aviation Administration cites are inconsistent, according to enforcement letters obtained by Motherboard using the Freedom of Information Act.
The documents involve 24 different people or companies and the FAA's FOIA office says they are the entirety of the Federal Aviation Administration's enforcement efforts against drone pilots thus far.
In October, FAA Deputy Administrator Michael Whitaker told Congress that the FAA had issued 20 civil penalties to drone operators. I filed a FOIA request for documents related to those penalties as well as any other penalties enforced by the agency during the time the request was being processed.
The documents the FAA sent me show that the fine for flying a drone recklessly vary wildly: Some hobbyists have settled with the FAA for as little as $400, while others, such as the man who crashed his drone on the White House lawn, have paid as much as $5,500.
More commonly, the FAA fines people between $1,100 and $2,200 and, if it receives pushback, offers to settle for much less. Commercial operators have been fined as much as $1.9 million. All of these documents are embedded at the bottom of this post.
"There's drones being used all over the country, so why such a focus on New York, Washington, and Boston?"
"They propose a scare-you-to-death fine, you talk to them, and then they give you a slap-on-the-wrist fine and go on their way," Peter Sachs, a Connecticut-based drone attorney told me.
Be careful if you fly on the East Coast
The FAA has issued fines to people who have flown drones into public buildings, over sports stadiums, and in Washington DC's restricted flight area. Those fines make at least some amount of sense—more puzzlingly, the FAA has fined people for flights that have ended in no incident whatsoever, and once fined two people who crashed their drones into each other over the ocean in Puerto Rico.
Almost all of the fines have come from the FAA's eastern region office, which appears to have taken a hardline stance against drones. This means that almost all of the FAA's drone fines have come in east coast cities, with a couple of isolated fines in Texas, Alabama, and Puerto Rico.
"The penalties are disturbingly all over the place. The allegations, even though they're coordinated through headquarters, are all over the place," Loretta Alkalay, who was head of the FAA's Eastern Regional legal office for 20 years and is now a drone law professor, told me. "Some inspectors call it an aircraft, some places it's an unmanned system."
"There's drones being used all over the country, so why such a focus on New York, Washington, and Boston?" she said. "There are other big cities in the US."
The FAA has one go-to violation it cites when fining drone pilots, but the agency is willing to pull out additional regulations or violations if it wants to throw the book at a person or company.
The standard violations the FAA cites are ones that prohibit people from operating an aircraft "in a careless or reckless manner," or in certain types of airspace. But in other instances it has fined people for flying a drone without "an operable coded radar beacon transponder," and "automatic altitude reporting equipment." These are instruments almost no drones have, and the regulations being used are for manned aircraft.
Sachs says that much of the evidence the FAA uses in enforcement investigations comes from publicly available YouTube videos, commercial operators' websites, and media and police reports. This is backed up by previous FAA documents Motherboard has obtained.
Are there more fines?
The FAA would not comment on specific cases. Patricia McNall, an FAA attorney who handled my FOIA request, wrote in a cover letter that these were all the enforcement actions that the FAA had issued and did not mention there being any other cases. An FAA spokesperson was unable to say for sure if there were any other cases not included in the FOIA. I was referred to an FAA document about enforcement actions notes that the agency only advises issuing penalties if an inspector decides there is a "medium or high actual or potential risk to safety," though it does not define what those thresholds might be.
Getting a response to my FOIA took seven months because of a backlog of requests and general disorganization at the FAA. Shari Harvey, who is taking over most of the drone FOIAs at the FAA, told me a few weeks before I got a response that the agency's database for drone infractions is fragmented to the point where seemingly simple searches require the cooperation of many different offices. Safety inspectors, who issue the fines, report to the Flight Standards District Offices, which are supposed to eventually report to FAA headquarters.
Both men were fined because of "damage to the hotel property," even though the drones crashed into the ocean
"Nothing is centralized," Harvey told me. The official I worked with wrote in a response to my request that these were all of the fines the agency has issued, but spokespeople for the FAA headquarters weren't able to confirm that was the case. It's entirely possible, then, that even the FAA has no idea how many fines it has issued. These documents are, however, the most complete list of fines ever released. If you know of any others, please contact me.
If you're a drone law nerd, the documents make for interesting reading. If you're not, the broad takeaways here are that only certain FAA offices care or have the bandwidth to worry about punishing drone pilots.
The documents also suggest that if you're fined by the FAA, you should definitely appeal or ask for a settlement, because there's a good chance you can end up with a lower fine. It's also noteworthy that you could be fined even if you don't crash your drone into anything. And one last thing: Don't fly your drone near a sporting event, and definitely stay out of Washington DC, where fines are uniformly the highest.
Here's what happened in every case, in order from lowest fine to highest fine:
Austin, Texas, August 30, 2014, Shawn Phillip Wyse; $1,100
Wyse flew a Phantom II above Texas Memorial Stadium at University of Texas at Austin during a University of Texas football game. He was fined $1,100 but settled for $800.
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, November 14, 2015, Gregory Taylor; $1,100
Taylor flew a Phantom 2 above the Bryant Denny Football Stadium before a University of Alabama v Mississippi State University football game. The drone "descended into a parking lot and struck a pedestrian just before it fell to the ground." Taylor turned himself in. Taylor was fined $1,100 but it was reduced to $900.
Queens, New York, May 25, 2014, Clinton Bascom; $1,100
Bascom flew his Phantom in Flushing Meadow Park and above CitiField Stadium, where the Mets play. He was fined $1,100 but it was later reduced to $550.
San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 18, 2015, Marcos Plaja-Ferreira and Alberto Haber-Flores; $1,100 each
Plaja-Ferreira's drone collided midair with Alberto Haber-Flores's drone above the ocean outside the Caribe Hilton Hotel. Both men were fined because of "damage to the hotel property," even though the drones crashed into the ocean.
US Coast Guard Housing Complex Rio Bayamon, Puerto Rico, Jorge Lubo, July 5, 2015; $1,100
Lubo apparently flew his Parrot Bebop drone in the housing complex two separate times and was warned by the FAA about flying his drone there. On July 5, he flew the drone again and crashed it into a US Coast Guard vehicle.
Fairfield Avenue and Fort George Hill (Bronx), Wilkens Mendoza, July 7, 2014; $1,100
Mendoza was arrested by the NYPD along with Remy Castro for flying a drone near the George Washington Bridge. Interestingly, the FAA enforcement action against Mendoza doesn't mention the George Washington Bridge flight and instead focuses on his flights in the Bronx. The FAA later sent Mendoza a letter withdrawing the fine.
Capitol Building, Albany, New York, Adam Rupeka, September 17, 2015; $1,100
Rupeka crashed his drone onto the New York capitol building. He had a history of run-ins with the police which are worth reading about.
Portside Apartments, East Boston, Jose Paderes, August 30, 2015; $1,100
The FAA says Paderes flew his DJI Inspire One too close to Logan International Airport. The investigation doesn't mention any incident or crash.
Manhattan, New York, July 7, 2014, Remy Castro; $1,600
Castro flew his Phantom II near the George Washington Bridge in New York City. A police helicopter chased after it. The FAA said the helicopter "was required to perform evasive maneuvers in order to avoid a collision with the aircraft," but air traffic control records found that the NYPD lied about what happened. He was fined $1,600 but it was later reduced to $800.
Eddelman landed his DJI Phantom II on the roof of AT&T stadium (where the Cowboys play). He landed it on the roof, and then tried to recover it with a second drone, which he also flew above the Texas Rangers stadium while there were spectators present. He was fined $2,200 but settled for $1,000.
290 Central Avenue, Brooklyn, Isaac Rosa, September 17, 2014; $2,200
Rosa flew near an NYPD helicopter, the FAA says he was within 50 feet of the helicopter at 750 feet. The NYPD was using the helicopter to look for a missing person and had to perform an evasive maneuver. He was fined $2,200 but the case was settled for $1,555.
38th Street between 3rd Avenue and Lexington Avenue, Manhattan, David Zablidowski, September 30, 2013; $2,200
Zablidowski flew his DJI Phantom into several buildings on 40th and 41st street, eventually landing on the ground 20 feet from a person. His case was settled for $400. Zablidowski was the first hobbyist ever fined for flying a drone.
Citi Field, Henry Wolters, May 6, 2015; $2,200
Wolters flew a drone above Citi Field during a Mets game where approximately 12,000 people were in attendance.
Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, Queens, Daniel Verley, September 3, 2015; $2,200
Verley flew his drone above the US Open, where about 200 people were watching. The drone crashed 70 feet from the tennis court. The FAA settled for $1,320.
Washington DC, (Polo Fields in West Potomac Park), Damian Dizard, March 25, 2015; $3,300
Dizard flew within the Washington DC Flight Restricted Zone, encompasses a 30-mile radius surrounding DC and makes flying all drones illegal without special permission. This is one of the few cases in which nothing bad seemed to happen—no crash was reported. He was fined $3,300 but later had it reduced to $1,100.
West Potomac Park, Washington DC, Monica Singleton, March 25, 2015; $3,300
Singleton appears to have been flying with Damian Dizard.
Lafayette Park, Washington DC, Ryan MacDonald, May 14, 2015; $4,400
MacDonald flew in Lafayette Park, which is near the White House. The FAA says that the secret service "cleared the entire north side of the White House of people … due to your operation of the aircraft." MacDonald appears to have paid his $4,400 fine.
Washington DC, (G Street and 10th St NW) Shawn Usman, January 26 2015; $5,500
Usman notoriously crashed his drone into a tree on the White House lawn, causing a national conversation on drone safety and White House security. It was later reported that Usman was a government employee at the time and was also allegedly drunk during his flight. The FAA fined him $5,500.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Raphael Pirker, April 13, 2012; $10,000
This was the first drone fine case in the United States and was the subject of a long, ongoing court battle. Pirker eventually settled for $1,100.
441 East Fordham Road, Bronx NY, Xizmo Media Productions, May 16, 2015; $18,700
Xizmo was hired by Fordham University to shoot footage of its 2015 commencement ceremony. The FAA says that because Xizmo's drone wasn't registered, flew in a reckless manner, and also pulled out several other regulations that are normally used for manned aircraft. Xizmo eventually settled with the FAA for $5,000 and is paying $222.22 to the FAA every month through June 2017.
All over Manhattan, SkyPan; $1.9 Million
This is the largest drone fine ever levied. According to the FAA, SkyPan repeatedly flew near high rises in restricted airspace. Read more about the fine and the investigation that led to it here. This case is ongoing.
Coney Island Boardwalk, David Quinones, July 4, 2015; Surrendered Pilot's license
Quinones was hired by a company called Skycam to fly a drone over the Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest. Quinones, a commercial pilot of manned aircraft, had his pilot's license suspended for 90 days and was required to surrender his pilot's certificate during the suspension. The FAA said it would fine him $1,100 per day that he refused to surrender it.