Image: Lisbon Council/Flickr
Advertisement
What “internet governance” means here is the technical management of the internet. For example, ICANN, the body responsible for overseeing domain names (among other tasks), is a US organisation. And while it’s technically a non-profit, it’s under contract from the US Department of Commerce. The EC proposals specifically name ICANN as an aspect they’d like to see “globalised,” so that one organisation in one country—a country in which trust has diminished on digital matters since the Snowden leaks came out—doesn’t hold all the cards.Other actions proposed include launching a Global Internet Policy Observatory to keep up transparency in internet policies and a review of where local laws might conflict on internet issues. The keywords are keeping the internet open, transparent, and inclusive.Arguing over who gets to be in charge might seem counterproductive to an effort emphasising the global nature of the internet, but Europe isn’t suggesting it should take over from the US as web ringleader. Rather, it wants to lead the debate—and make sure it’s not overlooked.Human rights & freedoms not negotiable. Let's make Europe's voice & values heard loud and clear. #InternetGovernance
— Neelie Kroes (@NeelieKroesEU) February 12, 2014
Advertisement