Advertisement
Quigley, in reviewing the bail decision, said the number of such references was a "jaw dropper" and that Zuker has "a mind that may be a little too full." He said the judgment "raises questions of having a predisposed mind." Ururyar's team said Zuker's "apprehension of bias" is grounds for appeal.Speaking to VICE Thursday, Gray said she's angry that Zuker didn't just grant Ururyar bail in the first place—something she'd mentally prepared for because of how common it is."It caused a lot of unnecessary hardship for me, it's been in appeal court for the last two days, it's been in the media again. When things get in the media, I receive so many threats every single day," she said.However, despite both Crown and defense saying Ururyar has grounds for an appeal of his conviction, Gray said she's not worried about him being successful. She admitted that Zuker's judgment—delivered in a domestic violence court—was "unusual" but pointed out that that's the point of having specialized courts.Read more: Judge In York University Rape Trial Slams Justice System While Delivering Guilty Verdict
Advertisement