Image: YouTube screengrab
Advertisement
Advertisement
"The initial complaint was made because of a privacy concern, but I think that morphed into a public safety issue once the police realized I was in a public area," Hair told me. "I don't think anything would have come from this had the woman [who made the initial complaint] not been paranoid about drones."Hopefully, both pilots and observers will use common sense in the future—this could remain an isolated incident, but if drones continue to be looked at as an instrument of surveillance, and the media continues to report on them as if they are something to be feared, it almost certainly won't be. To some extent, we've seen the same thing happen with Google Glass.In the original cut of the video, Haughwout included both his cell phone's video and the video being shot from his drone. That footage showed that the beach was nearly deserted and that his drone was several hundreds of feet in the air, where no person could reasonably be identified—let alone get "spied on." In a forum post that alerted me to the situation last month (Haughwout held out on posting the video until Mears was arraigned), Haughwout says he never flew below 50 feet, "save for take off/landing."There are two sides to every story—and I'm sure we'll hear Mears' side in court—but it's a shame that YouTube has since taken down Haughwout's original video. I watched it late Friday night, before YouTube removed the segment for containing content designed to "harass, bully, or threaten."Here's the video he took that day. The beach is empty (though there's one crazy dude in the water), and you certainly can't identify any people—take a look: