Image: Flickr/MashleyMorgan
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
.@BobbyJindal Gonna uphold the Constitution as your oath requires, or sign the unconstitutional drone bill(s) that make photography a crime?
— Peter Sachs, Esq. (@TheDroneGuy) April 19, 2014
Both bills still need to pass the state’s House and be signed by Governor Bobby Jindal before becoming law, but even if that happens, don’t expect either to stand if challenged in court. States are certainly right to be concerned about the power of small, flying cameras to infringe on citizens' privacy rights. But a blanket ban on photography, with little regard for the rights of photographers that have already been established in the court systems, isn't the way to go about doing it. Louisiana is tossing aside the First Amendment to protect the Fourth..@NOLAnews Apparently @DanClaitor doesn’t understand constitutional or property law. Must have skipped a lot of classes in law school. :)
— Peter Sachs, Esq. (@TheDroneGuy) April 15, 2014